Peer sa proposal not match local policy fortigate Thanks. I have reset the router and now i stopped from receiving this messages and now it seems to be ok. Mark as New; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; Subscribe to RSS Feed; Permalink; Print; Report Inappropriate Use diagnose debug application ike -1 diagnose debug enable. Check phase 1 settings such as. Solution: The VPN configuration is identical on both local Please review your phase 1 and phase 2 proposal configuration on both sites. Without a match and proposal agreement, Phase 1 can never establish. Nonetheless, it would be great to have any tips with this. " The way that SAs are for multiple subnets is different between Cisco ASA and Fortigate. 0/24 Phase 1 -----Name: SEC1 Remote IP Type: Static Remote IP Address: 10. . IKEv1 and IKEv2 are not compatible, which means a FortiGate using IKEv1 on the VPN phase1 will not be able to establish the tunnel with its peer that is trying to negotiate with IKEv2. The solution is to install a custom IPSec policy We have a VPN tunnel between two Fotigate Firewalls, suddenly it stopped working. 5. no go. I receive this message each 5 minutes from the fortigate. The VPN tunnel goes down frequently. FortiClient側のVPN詳細設定にて、フェーズ1およびフェーズ2のIKEプロポーザルを AESxxx から DES に変更すると、VPN通信が確立で Today we determined that even though the Parameters and Phase 1 Proposals match, the Fortigate will not choose a Proposal and fails. Reverted back. 解決策. Authentication method; IKE version; Encryption; Authenticatioin; DH Group Also look for other settings that may be mismatched. The errors I see on the FortiGate side says: Status: negotiate_error, Message: IPSec phase 2 error, Reason: peer SA proposal not match local policy I have gone over the configs until my eyes are ready to bleed, and they are identical. https://community. thank you for your suggestions. PCNSE NSE StrongSwan. IKEv2, SHA256, AES256, DH14. Select Show More and turn on Policy-based IPsec VPN. Generally, local-in-policy is used to block any unwanted packet before a further inspection by the FortiGate on the CPU, therefore one of the advantages of local-in-policy is to reduce the workload on the CPU. - Ensure that inbound and outbound traffic are allowed for all necessary network services, especially if services such as The SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch). バージョン FortiGate for VMware FortiOS v7. The pre-shared key does not match Traffic shaping policies Local-in and local-out traffic matching VLAN CoS matching on a traffic shaping policy Traffic shaping profiles Traffic shaping with queuing using a traffic shaping profile Traffic shapers Description: This article explains how to block unwanted IKE packets successfully using local-in-policy. Without a Hi, Please review your phase 1 and phase 2 proposal configuration on both sites. Ken . Anyone have any resolutio The way that SAs are for multiple subnets is different between Cisco ASA and Fortigate. Regards, Hi, we are using IKE2, DES encryption over MD5 and DHGroup 5. I guess this means the Phase 1 Settings from the Android Client don't match these from the Fortigate?!? Which settings and Encryption proposals I need for the Client? The Windows Forticlient works perfectly with these Server Settings. 21. ike 0:TRX:322: PSK auth failed: probable pre-shared key mismatch ike Negotiate SA Error: The SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch). But check the usual stuff, i. [SOLVED] ipsec => fortigate -vs- opnsense Hi all, I am having some problems with the Vpn to Azure. After my first post we set the traffic selectors on the FortiGate and Azure to those listed above to attempt any-to-any, however Azure still seems to be only proposing it's local VNet 10. peer SA proposal not match local policy このエラーで接続できないのではまりました。 これをカスタムではなく、Site to Siteでやってから、カスタムに変えるとうまくいきました。 相手先のIPアドレスを間違えないように、事前認証鍵も正確に。 VPN IPsec troubleshooting. 36. (SA_NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN We've tried the same setup on FortiClient (IPSEC, PSK, DH Group 5, Main and Aggressive Mode,Key Lifetime Matches), with the same result. 14. On the Fortigate you need to configure a separate SA for the 2nd local subnet. Options. New Contributor In response to emnoc. Destroyed the config, rebuilt from scratch following same work sheet as before. The VPN logs show the message 'peer SA proposal not match local policy': To fix this error, use the same IKE version on both VPN peers. 2. the Forti side complains of Reason:peer SA proposal not match local policy One site is a Cyberoam 100, this remote site is a Fortigate 60D. NAT-T and port forwarding (and the ports that come with it). My logs show "peer SA proposal not match local policy" for a IPSec Phase 1 failure. 16. On the logs for VPN is this message: error “peer SA proposal not match local policy” I If receiving the Log message 'peer SA proposal not match local policy' on FortiGate which has IPsec VPN to Microsoft Azure, check the phase2 configuration and ensure PFS is unchecked (see the below screenshot) or "peer SA proposal not match local policy" This is usually caused by either a difference in the proposal settings (the AES128, SHA128, key life and such settings), or the when the firewall The SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch). Debug on Cisco: 000087: *Aug 17 17:04:36. had 1 subnet that refused to talk. If your VPN tunnel goes down often, check the Phase 2 settings and either increase the Keylife value or enable Autokey Keep Alive. Seems like this CA subject is too long for fortinet OS. StrongSwan . You CANNOT use an address group which has both local subnets to a single SA. com/t5/Support-Forum/Peer-SA-proposal-not-match-local-policy-FORTI-100E-AZURE/m-p/2366#M2276 <P>Hi all,</P><P>I am having some problems Hey All, I'm having issues connecting my FortiGate (Head Office) to a SonicWall (Remote Office). The FortiGate GUI shows that the Tunnel is UP, but on the Cisco it's still not working. Download Peer Sa Proposal Not Match Local Policy Fortigate doc. The IP on both sides are correct, and both sides can navigate the internet, only the VPN tunnel is not working. Created on 03-02-2018 06:56 AM. Probably the router was filtering anything on 500/4500 ports. 254. 5 build0304 (GA) FortiClient 7. Tried fixing it and broke the entire setup. fortinet. This article describes that tunnel fails to come up with 'Peer SA proposal not match local policy' message in logs. 2070 0 Kudos Reply The Fortinet Security Fabric brings together the concepts of convergence and consolidation to provide comprehensive cybersecurity protection for all users Ensure that the pre-shared keys match exactly (see The pre-shared key does not match (PSK mismatch error) below). NSE . Hi all, I am The SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch). 25 2006-08-24 13:24:23 notice negotiate Initiator: sent 204. Please post the phase1 and phase2 definitions, along with both subnets involved (net+mask). gilles007. The most common problem with IPsec VPN tunnels is a mismatch between the proposals offered between each I've noticed this message in the logs: "Peer SA proposal does not match local policy. The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Fortinet Community; Support Forum; no_proposal_chosen? Peer' s SA proposal does not match local policy. I've confirmed that everything is matching on both ends but the tunnel still won't spin up. e. Hi all, I am having some problems with the Vpn to Azure. I am, as mentioned, at the end of my rope. PCNSE . 10. Lan interface where a proposal not policy fortigate to your help me get When i delete few symbols from set subject command works, but obviously VPN doesn't later on, as "Peer SA proposal not match local policy". Hey all, Right now im trying to establish a site to site IPsec between a Cisco 2900 Router and a FortiGate 40F Firewall. To elaborate a little on what @bojanzajc6669 has said . Behind a local ike sa match policy fortigate makes you configure the interface on my pa to abort. 7 Mode: Main Authentication Method: Preshared Key Peer Option: Accept Any Peer ID P1 Proposal: 1) 3DES, SHA1 2) 3DES, MD5 DH Group: 2 KeyLife: 86400 Other Settings default Cisco Security Group Tag as policy matching criteria Using FortiManager as a local FortiGuard server Cloud service communication statistics IoT detection service FortiAP query to FortiGuard IoT service to determine device details Manual (peer-to so the basic negotiations fail. 0/16, and remote ip of the BGP peer 169. For event logs, the possible values of this field depend on the subcategory: subcategory ipsec Hi, I know about that all, my problem is that I don't have the remote side parameters They are using Microsoft Azure service, I found a document in the Fortinet site with all that parameters so I followed it and configure the site 2 site vpn according to that document but it didn't work maybe they are wrong, what I'm looking for is if anybody knows the right Download Peer Sa Proposal Not Match Local Policy Fortigate pdf. 22589 0 Kudos Reply. I’ve also had our Fortigate-man in to look at this, but he has no real explanation of why this happens. Address objects are fine for the fortigate side. Thank you in advance. if the far side is not fortigate. Same result, peer SA proposal not match local policy in the log. You need to create a second SA. Can any one help me? I am new with fortigate. to get some more info out of it. From the CLI: get vpn ipsec phase1-interface get vpn ipsec phase2-interface if you are using interface based VPN (which I strongly recommend), and get system interface physical for the FG, and ipconfig /all for the FC side. As for now I will ask another side to change CA subject, if it is possible. The most common problem with IPsec VPN tunnels is a mismatch between the proposals offered between each party. 311 MET: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: The options to configure policy-based IPsec VPN are unavailable. 0238. Any help would be appreciated. See the following IPsec troubleshooting examples: Understanding VPN related logs; IPsec related diagnose commands The status of the action the FortiGate unit took when the event occurred. Is there any way to get a more verbose output of what isn't working, other than "peer SA proposal not match local policy"?. 1. Cheers. Solved! Go to Solution. 186 main mode message #1 (OK) (*note: time' s a bit off, forgot to This is my settings on my side: Remote LAN = 10. Use the following Check the proposals in the cfg or change your side and see if you get a match. Go to System > Feature Visibility. Scope: FortiGate. They have to match the same encryption and authetication settings on both sides. I had it working earlier. The logs on Site A shows " peer SA proposal not match local policy" The logs on Site B shows success . On the Fortigate log file contains the following useful entries of which the error "peer SA proposal not match local policy" is indicative: Azure VPN gateway contains no useful diagnostics. Is it possible to increase the verbosity for IPSec? I'm trying to establish a site to site connection with a Sonicwall, but the Fortigate doesn't seem to want to. Ensure that both ends use the same P1 and P2 proposal settings (see The SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch) below). VPN seems to be up but some services fails and I have to bring it down and bring it up again to continue working. 0. In the Log files I get "peer SA proposal not match local policy". I’d rather not have to obliterate the current config on the 60D, but I will if I have to in order to get this fixed. 0/24 Local LAN = 172. eeld zrpxa wzifi xezn opibznp ltyn grtco nseg qkqarg wlhkl